New Pension Scheme!
.
Some comrades asked me why not you write about NPS scheme?
When
you join the scheme through your Bank, you might be provided with details of
the scheme. Also there is a detailed FAQ in Pension portal website.
************************************************************************
As per
my calculation if an employee ( Graduate clerk) on joining, the Bank contribution,
repeat, Bank contribution of Rs. 3350 per month (11 th BPS numbers) for 35
years, the return at the rate of 8% is= xx.xx lacs
( By recurring deposit calculation method)
Calculate the maturity amount yourselves.
This monthly subscription will vary
1. 1. every 3 month due to
increase in D.A,
2. 2. by every year as he will be getting one increment per
year,
3. 3. and by every 5 year, as there will be a wage revision.
Therefore
the total return will be much much higher, even after taking into account
inflation over years.
Improvements
are made in NPS from time to time as follows.
1.
Withrawals allowed during service period like P.F. .
2.
No Tax on maturity amount on retirement on par with P.F..
3.
Can encash 60% of the maturity amount instead of 40%
earlier.
Remaining 40% may be invested towards
pension.
4.
Contribution by Bank is increased from 14% from 10% on Basic Pay +D.A
Therfore benefit wise it is
not a bad scheme.
Then
why we oppose this scheme?
We have doubts about
1. Whether the funds will be stable and steady?
(i.e. whether our funds will be safe?)
2. Whether it will give minimum return of 8% i.e equal to P.F. ?
Now Central Govt., and State Govt., employees are fighting for reversal of this
scheme and demand for converting all employees to old Pension Scheme.
(West
Bengal is the only state that didn’t implement NPS)
In my view it is a distant possibility.
From
2004 lack of employees were recruited in Central, State Govt., and in PSBs.
Fund collected from these employees were deposited with Pension Funds , and in
turn it has been invested in different instruments like Equity ,Debentures, and
Govt., Bonds.
Taking out all these investments at a time and re-credit to respective
departments and in turn crediting the individual employees is not possible.
Moreover
It is a policy decision taken by the Govt.,
Both
Congress and B.J.P support this in one voice.
My suggestion is to demand the Govt.,
1. A. to give Guarantee
for our Principle amount and
2. B. for a minimum return say 8%.
Asking
for total reversal from NPS to old Pension Scheme may not yield desired result,
in my view.
Govt., at one stage on pressure from opposition parties come forward to give
guarantee for minimum return %,
In the meantime Govt., changed.
The
above is my view.
You
may not accept it.
Opinion
always differs.
Comrades may express their views.
****************************
Estimated
starting new Basic pay and D.A for a Graduate clerk:
Basic
Pay after merger of 47.85% D.A and loading of 2.5% thereon
=13075+6250=19325=>19808+(New
D.A @0.07%on 297 slabs) 4118=23926
Bank
contribution 14% on 23926=3350
If you are a union leader then explain your new pretence over 5 day banking..
ReplyDeleteOne advantage is at any point of time one may leave the job and the fund will be remain with him. In case of pension, min 20 years service is required.
ReplyDeleteNPS is giving me approximately 10 percent return. Much better than any other scheme. I am in favour of NPS.
ReplyDeleteThis is at present when things are going well. The writer mentioned this fact only that when times go bad, this return may be below 8 percent. That's why he supports NPS but want a minimum guarantee of 8 percent return.
Delete