|
ALL INDIA BANK OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION
CENTRAL
OFFICE
A.K.Nayak
Bhavan, 2nd Floor 14,
CHENNAI-600 001
|
|
Phone: 25265511 / M
9840645081 / FAX: 044-25249081 / e mail:
aiboa.hq@gmail.com
www.aiboa.org
IBA:KS:39:2015
April
14, 2015
The
Deputy Chief Executive Officer,
Indian
Banks Association,
Cuffe
Parade,
MUMBAI.
Sir,
REG; Draft
Medical Scheme for employees of member banks of IBA and their family members in
lieu of existing Hospitalization Scheme.
REF; 1. Your e mail dated
13.03.2015.
2. Our letter IBA: BKS:22:2015 DATED
14.03.2015.
Further
to our email communication, as an interim response, our organization strongly
feels that tie up arrangement with any Insurance company and routing through
the claim to TPA is amounting to outsourcing of the staff related matters,
hence deserves to be rejected in toto. Apart from the above hardly 15% of
the employees are claiming the reimbursement under Hospitalization Scheme, the
same should be handled by the Personnel department of the individual Banks. As
the standardization is the principled approach in similarly placed employees in
Banks, the best of schemes available in State Bank of India as well as in Bank of
India may be harmonized and extended to all Banks.
The
employee shall deal only with the Bank and not with the Insurance company/TPA.
Notwithstanding the above we
suggest as under the clause wise observations.
Clause
1.1 Dependent Income- Looking to increased cost of living inflation
and high medical costs ceiling on monthly income of dependents be increased to
Rs. 20,000/- excluding Pension.
Is there any need for
fixing income for dependants when we take separately Mediclaim no such
insistence is there
Clause
1.3
A.
Officers; Rs.6,00,000 , Employees Rs 4,00,000. Higher coverage
upon payment of premium by the individual employees, as in the case of LIC
should be permitted.
B.
A lump sum of Rs.one lac
available to self fir critical illness should be made available to dependents
also
Clause
1.5 ICU when ventilator is used
max. Ceiling should be reimbursed
upto Rs.20000/- per day.
Clause
2.12 Hospital / Nursing Home : At centres
having population below 1 lac, requirement of 10 bed hospital should be removed.
Minimum bed of 10 as
inpatient should be removed if area is Rural/Semi urban but a good Hospital / Nursing
Home /Doctors are available and are found fine.
Clause
2.15 The id card issued to the
employees should have embossed the name of IBA/respective Bank for availing
cashless facilities.
Clause
2.22 Medical expenses: Clause seems to be
arbitrary as there is no mechanism to compare charges/expenses of other
hospitals/doctors. Bills certified by
treating Doctors may not be disputed
Clause
2.23 Even if not hospitalized expenses
made for scan like MRI / CT scan should be reimbursed.
Clause
2.30 No restriction pre existing
disease should be accepted. The 48 months stipulation is arbitrary.
Clause
3.1 Diphtheria diabetic medicines,
Blood pressure to be added
Clause
3.2 Pluracy, Diphtheria and chronic
hepatitis /diabetic. We have a recent
case of FGM, CBI, and Chronic where 18 lacs is spent on pluracy / diabetic
treatment.
Any invasively implanted
on a permanent basis on one’s body like transplanted heart/kidney should be
fully reimbursed. No ceiling.
Pace maker implanted
like dual chamber etc. No ceiling should
be there as it costs more than 7 lacs now
Donor’s expenditure like
kidney donor. In such cases too
restriction on Hospitalization or domiciliary should not be there in
reimbursement.
Clause
3.4 Alternative Therapy: There
may be only few clinic/hospitals of alternative therapy recognized by Govts.,
and treatment is usually taken from practitioners. Such expenses should also be
covered.
Clause
3.5 Maternity Expenses Benefit Extension:
At Metro and bigger centres, cost is very high. Thus ceiling needs
to be raised to Rs.50,000/- for normal and Rs. 1,00,000/- for caesarean
section.
Clause
3.7 If a patient is to be moved to
outside urban agglomeration or municipal limit, taxi charges to be reimbursed @ Rs.20/- per km upto maximum of
Rs.2000/- as available in some Banks
even now.
Clause
4 The
exclusion clause should be revisited, as there are glaring deficiencies
prevailing in the existing scheme.
Clause
4.3 Cost
of spectacles, contact lenses and hearing aids be covered as these are the
devices to cover illness of employees and improve his working capacity.
Clause
4.4 Dental
treatment or surgery be included in day care treatments without restrictions.
Similarly treatment of Obesity or Infertility also needs to be covered.
Clause
4.5 Barring
use of intoxication drugs/alcohol not correct. These treatments should be
covered as these are very much diseases. and cure / rehabilitation is socially desirable.
Similarly cases of
treatment of self inflicted injuries also need to be covered adopting humanitarian approach’
Clause
4.6 Whole
world is trying to eradicate misgivings about treating Aids as stigma thus its
exclusion in scheme is very much retrograde.
Clause
4.7 Clause is arbitrary and can be misused. These
are discretions of treating doctors which can not be challenged or controlled
by the patient. Thus all investigations done during hospitalization to be reimbursed
Note:
Exclusion of declared/undeclared
War related or Enemy inflicted injuries may not be Justified as bank staff has to work near
border areas also moreover 26/11 type instances also occur.
Other
Suggestions:
1.
Full Income tax exemption for the reimbursement of
hospitalization expenses should also be ensured.
2.
There is a need to have in built system to have the Health Check
up system.
3.
Treatment taken abroad should also be covered.
4.
In the event of claim ration is less than 50% during the renewal
of the master policy some more additional coverage may be thought of.
5.
All the retirees are to be extended the cover by paying one time
contributory premia.
Yours faithfully,
/S.NAGARAJAN/
GENERAL SECRETARY
Existing Insurance companies charge heavy premium and create lot of hurdles for settlement of claims. They will not have any insurable interest other than collecting premium. Banks are posting employees to nook and corners of the country. deterioration of health while working in inhospitable areas is to be understood by employers. If the claim is rejected any amount of insurance is of no value to the employees.
ReplyDelete